Puzzling out child custody is an exercise whose solution holds monumental weight. Such determinations require a level of certainty and confidence in our own judgment. How is it then that we court involved professionals – judges, attorneys, and mental health workers – are so frequently at odds with each other’s decision making? What accounts for the wide variability in judgment? Do we even know when we might be wrong? This presentation examines the cognitive and social psychology literature to seek answers and new strategies. Given the complex emotional needs of children, an attorney’s obligation to advocate for their client, the limitations of our judicial system, and our mandate to serve “best interests,” presenters aspire to chart a new course. A series of mindful steps will be offered as a roadmap to puzzle-solve using a flexible mindset – and of course, humility.
Learning Objectives:
- Identify three analytical behaviors consistent with complex thinking.
- Reflect upon the utility of applying intellectual humility while addressing complex custodial matters.
- Describe what a meaningful parent-child connection might look like without consideration to custodial time-share.
- Conceptualize a custodial decision-making process that adapts to new developments.